Appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against orders in an arbitration original petition; appellant sought leave to withdraw after partial hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.No.915 of 2024 and Arb.Appeal No.8 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
C.M.A.No.915 of 2024
and Arb.Appeal No.8 of 2024
and C.M.P.Nos.19011 and 8494 of 2024
Maurius Anton Chrislyn Cardoza ... Appellant in both Appeals
-vs-
Praveen Manavalan Rep. by Power Agent, Tharini Manavalan
... Respondent in both Appeals
Prayer : Appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the orders dated 25.03.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 and 02.08.2024 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2024 in Arb.O.P.No.427 of 2023 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant in both Appeals : Mr.S.Marimuthu For Respondent in both Appeals : Mr.S.R.Raghunathan for Mr.Manjunath Karthikeyan * * * * *
___________ Page 1 of 3_
COMMON JUDGMENT
C.M.A.No.915 of 2024 and Arb.Appeal No.8 of 2024
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
After the appeals were heard for some time, counsel for appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeals.
Accordingly, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and Arb.Appeal are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim applications also stand dismissed.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.) 16.12.2024
Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No
sra
___________ Page 2 of 3_
C.M.A.No.915 of 2024 and Arb.Appeal No.8 of 2024
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.
(sra)
C.M.A.No.915 of 2024 and Arb.Appeal No.8 of 2024
16.12.2024
___________ Page 3 of 3_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maurius Anton Chrislyn Cardoza
Praveen Manavalan Rep. by Power Agent, Tharini Manavalan
K.R.Shriram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
