Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against a Company Law Board order was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant's counsel gave no representation despite the matter being listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.No.3600 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
C.M.A.No.3600 of 2006
Smt.Pushpa Singh .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.BPL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.British Physical Laboratories India Limited) Administrative Office-64, Church Street, Bangalore- 560 001.
.. Respondent
Prayer : This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1996, against the Judgment dated 21.12.2001 made in C.A.No.BPL 18/5A (9)/SRB/2001 on the file of the Company Law Board, Chennai.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance ***
1/4
C.M.A.No.3600 of 2006
J U D G M E N T
When this Appeals was taken up for hearing on 26.04.2024, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submitted that they have given change of vakalat for the Appellant and therefore this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the Appellant and the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., on 26.04.2024.
there is no representation on behalf of the Appellant today. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
26.04.2024
arr Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
To
2.The Section Officer, VR Section,
2/4
C.M.A.No.3600 of 2006
High Court, Madras.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
arr
C.M.A.No.3600 of 2006
3/4
C.M.A.No.3600 of 2006
26.04.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt.Pushpa Singh
M/s.BPL Limited
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
