M/s.a S Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s.Ibcc Industries (india) Pvt. Ltd.

Madras HC25 Apr 2024Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/56/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 regarding disputes under a Memorandum of Understanding dated 15.03.2021. Counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty, and the Court dismissed it as withdrawn.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

M/s.a S Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s.Ibcc Industries (india)… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.56 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25.04.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.56 of 2024

¶7

M/s.A.S.Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director-Finance & Accounts, Mr.S.Sundararajan (A/a.50 yrs.), Navin's Presidium, Nelson Manickam Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai- 600 029.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

.. Vs..

¶10

M/s.IBCC Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director Plot No.B16A & B17, Gallops Industrial Park Phase -1, National Highways No.8A, Rajoda, Taluk - 382 220. ... Respondent

¶11

Arbitration Original Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an Arbitrator by this Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 to adjudicate the disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent in terms of the Arbitration Agreement in the Memorandum of Understanding dated

¶12

1/3

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.56 of 2024

¶15

15.03.2021 and fix the fees of the Arbitrator and direct the Respondent to pay the costs.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.J.V.Niranjan For Respondent : Ms.Krithika Jaganathan for M/s.Lakshmi Kumaran and Sridharan Attorneys

¶17

ORDER

¶18

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the

¶19

Petitioner had sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition. He

¶20

has also made the following endorsement to that effect:

¶21

" May be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty "

¶22

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the

¶23

Petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this Arbitration

¶24

Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶25

25.04.2024

¶26

Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No arr

¶27

2/3

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.56 of 2024

¶30

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., arr

¶31

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.)No.56 of 2024

¶32

25.04.2024

¶33

3/3

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s.a S Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s.Ibcc Industries (india) Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

M/s.a S Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s.Ibcc Industries (india) Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahalakshmi Vs Saravananan Lakshamanan

S Siva Vs B Satyamurthy

M/s Cornerstone Construction Limited Vs M/s Central Institute Of Petrochemicals Engineering And Technology

Sachin Jain Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

The Official Liquidator Vs M/s.Era Infra Engineering Ltd.

M/s Indusind Bank Ltd. Vs Jasa Ram Bishnoi