Disposed

K.Harikrishnan v. G.Ramakrishnan

Madras HC9 Mar 2024CMA/1124/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai, held a National Lok Adalat to settle a Motor Accident Claims Appeal. The parties agreed to enhance the Tribunal's award by Rs. 75,000. The Insurance Company must deposit this amount within six weeks, permitting the appellant to withdraw it without filing further petitions.

What did the court decide?

Insurance Company to deposit enhanced compensation of Rs. 75,000 within six weeks; appellant permitted to withdraw without filing petition.

K.Harikrishnan Vs G.Ramakrishnan — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI

¶2

National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee

¶3

Saturday, the 09 th day of March, 2024

¶4

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶5

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶6

Presided over by

¶7

The Hon'ble Mrs.Justice R.KALAIMATHI AND

¶8

Members

¶9

Mr.A.Thanikasalam, District Judge (Retd.) Mrs.K.Kavitha, Advocate

¶10

C.M.A.No.1124 of 2023

¶11

Appeal against the Judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.5392 of 2017 dated 10.11.2021 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (IV Court of Small Causes), Chennai.

¶12

K.Harikrishnan ...Appellant

¶13

Vs.

¶14

1.G.Ramakrishnan

¶15

2.United India Insurance Company Limited, Silingi Building, New No.134, Old No.42-45 Greams Road Chennai – 600 006 ...Respondents

¶16

This case is taken up for settlement before the National Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Ms.Ramya V Rao, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.D.Baskaran, learned counsel for the 2 nd respondent are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

¶17

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶18

The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.1,93,000/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a. from the date of numbering of petition till the date of realisation as compensation. Seeking enhancement of compensation, the appellant/claimant has preferred the present appeal.

¶19

2. The 2 nd respondent/Insurance Company has already deposited the amount awarded by the Tribunal and the same has been withdrawn by the appellant/claimant.

¶20

3. After due deliberation, both the parties have agreed for enhancement of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

the award amount by a sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand Only) in full quit over and above the amount already awarded by the Tribunal as compensation.

¶22

4.The 2^nd respondent/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced amount of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand Only) , within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

5. On such deposit, the appellant/claimant is permitted to withdraw the enhanced amount without filing any formal petition.

¶24

6. The Tribunal is directed to transfer the amount through RTGS/NEFT to the parties concerned on proper identification in accordance with the terms of the award, with out insisting on any formal permission petition. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of.

¶25

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶26

The entire Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶27

K.Harikrishnan Counsel for Appellant United India Insurance Company Limited, Silingi Building, New No.134, Old No.42-45 Greams Road Chennai – 600 006 Counsel for 2 nd Respondent

¶28

Judge

¶29

Member Member mac/gya

¶30

R.KALAIMATHI,J.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

mac/gya

¶33

To: The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to: 1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,(IV Court of Small Causes), Chennai 2 .The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai. 3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶34

4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies

¶35

C.M.A.No.1124 of 2023

¶36

09.03.2024

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Harikrishnan v. G.Ramakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Harikrishnan v. G.Ramakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mugesh @ Vazhakka Vs State Rep.by

R.Muthuraman Vs R.Rajasundaram

Sheeba Selvaraj Vs Y.Sukila

Mallika Vs Periyasamy

C.Anand Sekaran Vs M.Charles Antony

C.Anand Sekaran Vs M.Charles Antony