First appeal against a preliminary decree in a partition suit was dismissed as settled out of court on the appellant's memo reporting an out-of-court settlement; the court fee was ordered refunded and the connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.S.No.87 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.2855 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date: 19.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
A.S.No.87 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.2855 of 2024
Velayutham ...Appellant
Vs.
PRAYER: Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C to set aside the preliminary decree and judgment dated 24.07.2023 passed in O.S.No.4304 of 2016 by the learned XXII Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Udhayakumar For R1 to R8 : No appearance For R9 : Mr.N.Muthuvel, Government Advocate
Page 1 of 3
A.S.No.87 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.2855 of 2024
JUDGMENT
When the case came up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Appellant sought permission of this Court to dismiss the First Appeal as settled out of Court and also filed a memo reporting that the subject matter of the First Appeal is settled outside between the parties. The memo is recorded.
19.11.2024
Shl Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
To:
Page 2 of 3
A.S.No.87 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.2855 of 2024
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
shl
A.S.No.87 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.2855 of 2024
19.11.2024
Page 3 of 3
Velayutham
Mrs. Gunabhoosanam
Mrs. Dillirani
Mr. Yuvaraj
Rangan
Yuvaraj
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
