Disposed

Sengamalai v. Mariyayee (Died) 1. Raja

Madras HC18 Nov 2024AS/387/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First appeal against a decree of the Additional District Munsif, Attur was erroneously filed before the Madras High Court and wrongly numbered by its Registry. Holding the appeal not maintainable there, the court struck it off from the Registry and directed transmission of records to the appropriate appellate court, to entertain the re-presented appeal without delay.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sengamalai Vs Mariyayee (Died) 1. Raja — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

A.S.No.387 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 18.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶6

Appeal Suit No.387 of 2023 and CMP.No.13580 of 2023

¶7

Sengamalai : Appellant/1^st Respondent

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Mariyayee (died)

¶10

Raja 2. Madheswari : Respondents 1 & 2/Petitioners Vaiyapuri (died)

¶11

Marimuthu (died)

¶12

Perumal

¶13

Aasara Kannu

¶14

Dhanam

¶15

Malar 7. Kala

¶16

1/7

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

A.S.No.387 of 2023

¶19

Kanimozhi @ Elavarasi : Respondents 3 to 8/Respondents 2 to 9

¶20

Prayer : This First Appeal has been filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment and Final Decree dated 26.10.2022 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in O.S.No.512 of 2004 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Attur.

¶21

For Appellant : Ms.K.Aswini Devi For Respondents : Ms.R.Yuvarani for Ms. R. Poornima for R-1 : Notice Returned – R-2 to R-8

¶22

JUDGMENT

¶23

The present Appeal is filed as against the judgment and decree passed by

¶24

the learned Additional District Munsif, Attur. The present Appeal ought to have been filed before the Appellate Court but it was erroneously filed before this Court. The Registry also without going through the fact that the order which is impugned in this Appeal has been passed by the District Munsif Court has erroneously numbered this Appeal. Subsequently, even when the Appeal is

¶25

taken up for hearing this Court had granted interim stay. Now it is noticed by this Court that the Appellant has bye-passed the procedure and filed the

¶26

2/7

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

A.S.No.387 of 2023

¶29

present Appeal before this Court and it is not maintainable before this Court. Therefore, the Registry is directed to transmit the entire case records in relation to this Appeal to the Court of Appeals concerned. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also directed to present the present Appeal before the Court of Appeal concerned for getting appropriate orders. The Appellate Court is directed to entertain the Appeal as and when it is re-presented by the learned Counsel for the Appellant without taking note of the delay in filing the Appeal.

¶30

While calculating the delay in filing the Appeal it is to be considered as the matter was pending before the High Court. Therefore, it should be considered favourably to the Appellant.

¶31

In the result, this Appeal Suit is struck off from the Registry. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶32

18.11.2024

¶33

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/7

A.S.No.387 of 2023

dh/SRM

4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

A.S.No.387 of 2023

¶40

¶41

The Additional District Munsif, Attur.

¶42

The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶43

5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

A.S.No.387 of 2023

¶45

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

¶46

dh/SRM

¶47

A.S.No.387 of 2023

¶48

6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

A.S.No.387 of 2023

¶50

18.11.2024

¶51

7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sengamalai v. Mariyayee (Died) 1. Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sengamalai v. Mariyayee (Died) 1. Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Vijayalakshmi Vs v.Ravikumar

Kothai Vs Sarala @ Shanthi

S.Baby Vs S. Gowri

Selvarasu Vs Baskar

Velayatham Vs Gunabhoosanam

P.Gnanaprakasam Vs Sree Varadaraja Benefit Fund Ltd.