Regular first appeal against a 2007 trial court decree was dismissed for non-prosecution after the appellants' counsel repeatedly failed to appear despite adjournments. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed and no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.S.No.631 of 2007
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
A.S.No.631 of 2007
and all connected miscellaneous petitions
2.Pushpakantha (Died)
3.Tamilselvi
4.Sudhayakumar
6.Rajkumar
[A1 Died. A2 to A6 are brought on record as LRs of deceased 1st appellant vide order of Court dated 31.03.2023 made in CMP.Nos.3995, 3858,3984, 3998 and 4000 of 2022]
[A2 Died. A3 to A6 are already on record as LRs of deceased A2. Memo recorded, vide order of Court dated 19.06.2023 made in A.S.No.631 of 2007]
...Appellants
Vs.
1/4
A.S.No.631 of 2007
1.Krishnaveni Ammal
2.J.Kalyani
3.J.Jagannathan
4.J.Malathi
6.K.V.Ponnuvelu (Died)
7.Jayalakshmi
8.Selvam
9.Rani
10.Ponselvi
11.Porselvan
[R6 Died. Respondents 9 to 11 are brought on record as LRs of deceased 6th respondent vide order of Court dated 24.01.2023 in CMP.Nos.18620, 18621, 18622, 18623 & 18624 in CMP.Nos.3995, 3998, 4000, 3858 &3984 and order dated 31.03.2023 made in CMP.Nos.3995, 3858, 3984, 3998 & 4000 of 2022.]
...Respondents
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 14.02.2007 passed by the Principal District Judge, Chengleput in O.S.No.81 of 2005.
2/4
A.S.No.631 of 2007
For Appellants : Mr.R.Ganesan For Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr.S.M.Loganathan For 6th Respondent : Mr.Devaraj For Respondents 7 to 8 : Me.Mr.M.Sriram
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J .)
Despite having taken several adjournments, the learned counsel for
the appellant is not ready. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. After passing the order of dismissal of the appeal, the learned counsel says he is ready to argue. We do not propose to hear him now. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
(R.S.M., J.) (C.K., J.) 18.12.2024
dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : No Non-Speaking order To
The Principal District Judge, Chengleput.
3/4
A.S.No.631 of 2007
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
dsa
A.S.No.631 of 2007
18.12.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Sivanandam
Pushpakantha
Tamilselvi
Sudhayakumar
Pugazhendi
Rajkumar
R.Subramanian
C.Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
