Mercedes Benz Financial Services India Private Limited v. Vandana Soni
Madras HCArb Appln/43/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., The learned counsel…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Arb.Appln.No.43 of 2024
¶2
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.,
¶3
The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the vehicle was seized and handed over to them by the learned Advocate Commissioner. In this regard, a report was also filed by the learned Advocate Commissioner.
¶4
- Further, he would submit that since the order copy of this Court dated 03.04.2024 was received by the applicant only on 26.04.2024, the applicant was unable to pay the additional remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner and hence, he seeks further time to pay the same.
¶5
- Post this matter on 05.06.2024 for reporting compliance.
¶6
29.04.2024
¶7
nsa
Coram
AI extract
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court