Arbitration application where the applicant's counsel reported that though the respondent had been served with notice, neither the respondent nor counsel appeared. The court recorded service and closed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Arb Appln NO. 348 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
Arb Appln NO. 348 of 2024
Tata Capital Limited formerly known as M/s. Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Registered office at Tower A, 11th Floor, Peninsula Business Park Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400013
Appellant(s)
Vs
Najeeb M A Najeeb Manzil Navaroji Purayidam, Lajanath ward Alapuzha HO, Near Puthan Palli Masjid, Alapuzha 688 001.formerly known as M/s. Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Registered office at Tower A, 11th Floor, Peninsula Business Park Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400013
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s):
M/s.M.Arunachalam
For Respondent(s):
Ms. A. Jachulin Elizabeth, Advocate Commissioner
Court Notice Await Service
P/n-aos.D.No. 47781, Dt. 10/12/2024 (sole Respt- Item Onhold Addressee Absen-intimation Served)
1/2
Arb Appln NO. 348 of 2024
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.M.Arunachalam, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that though the respondent has been served with notice, the respondent has not chosen to appear in person or through counsel. He has also filed affidavit of service.
2.Recording the same, this application is closed.
18-12-2024
ata
To
2/2
Tata Capital Limited formerly known as M/s. Tata Capital Financial Services Limited
Najeeb M A
P.B. Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
