Arbitration application concerning a vehicle seized and handed over by an Advocate Commissioner who failed to file a report. On the applicant's counsel's submission, the Court closed the application observing no further order was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Arb.Appln.No.119 of 2024
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.,
The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the vehicle was seized and handed over to them by the learned Advocate Commissioner. However, the learned Advocate Commissioner had failed to file a report with regard to the same.
29.04.2024
nsa
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
