Application in an insolvency petition seeking leave to file and mark three additional documents. The court, after hearing counsel and perusing the records, allowed the petition subject to proof and relevance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appln.(IP).No.102 of 2024 in I.P.No.25 of 2014
Dr.G. Jayachandran,J. &
C.V.Karthikeyan, J.
This petition is filed by the petitioner to permit the applicant to file and mark the document Nos.1, 2 and 3 as mentioned in the list of documents as additional documents on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Heard the Learned Counsel for the petitioner. Records perused.
3. This Petition is allowed subject to proof and relevance.
(Dr.G.J,J) & (C.V.K,J) 24.04.2024
bsm
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether additional documents Nos. 1 to 3 should be permitted to be filed and marked in I.P.No.25 of 2014?
Applicant/Petitioner
Dr.G.Jayachandran
C.V.Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
