Disposed

Shivsu Canada Pure Fillers Private Limited v. Shaik Dawood Traders

Madras HC10 Dec 2024APPEAL(CAD)/46/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against a commercial court money decree was settled: appellant offered Rs.5 lakh from the amount deposited as condition of admission, respondent accepted in full and final settlement, and the court directed payment to the respondent with the decree standing satisfied.

What did the court decide?

Rs.5 lakh deposit plus interest paid to respondent in full and final settlement; decree satisfied; appeal and CMP disposed, no costs.

Shivsu Canada Pure Fillers Private Limited… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Appeal (CAD) No.46 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.12.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶8

Appeal (CAD) No.46 of 2024 & C.M.P.No.25535 of 2024

¶9

M/s. Shivsu Canada Pure Fillers Private Limited Also known as Canada Pure Fillers Private Limited No.149, Poonamallee High Road Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010 Carrying on business at No.149, P.H. Road, Kilpauk Chennai 600 010. .. Appellant Vs.

¶10

M/s. Shaik Dawood Traders Rep. by its Proprietor V.T.Sahul Hameed Carrying on business at No.14, Mosque Street, Padi Chennai 600 050. .. Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act,

¶12

___________ Page 1 of 5_

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Appeal (CAD) No.46 of 2024

¶15

Commercial Division Act read with Order 96 of CPC against the order dated 05.04.2023 passed in COS No.1287 of 2022 on the file of the Commercial Court at Chennai.

¶16

For Appellant : Mr.Ram Kumar Natarajan For Respondent : Mr.M,A.Lakshmipathi

¶17

JUDGMENT

¶18

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶19

The appeal was admitted vide order dated 25.11.2024. It was a conditional order and appellant, who had a decree against him, was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5.00 lakh. The decree was in the sum of Rs.3,58,209/- plus interest thereon at 24% per annum from the date of plaint till the date of decree and further interest at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realisation. Counsel states the amount payable as on date will be in excess of Rs.7.00 lakh.

¶20

Yesterday, when the matter was called out, the Court suggested if

¶21

the parties could work out. At the request of counsel, we stood over the

¶22

Page 2 of 5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Appeal (CAD) No.46 of 2024

¶25

matter to today.

¶26

Today, when the matter was called out, counsel for appellant made a without prejudice offer and suggested that if respondent is ready to accept a sum of Rs.5.00 lakh in full and final settlement, respondent may withdraw the amount of Rs.5.00 lakh deposited in the Court, together with accumulated interest if any.

¶27

Counsel for respondent grabbed the opportunity and stated that respondent would accept the offer made by appellant in full and final settlement of all claims of respondent.

¶28

Therefore, the Registry is directed to pay over the amount of Rs.5.00 lakh deposited by appellant, as recorded in the memorandum of compliance dated 06.12.2024, together with interest if any, to respondent, without any deductions. If there is any tax payable, respondent shall be liable to pay income tax on the said amount.

¶29

Page 3 of 5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Appeal (CAD) No.46 of 2024

¶32

Upon payment of this amount, the decree shall stand satisfied.

¶33

The appeal stands disposed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

Consequently, the interim application also stands disposed of.

¶35

(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.) 10.12.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl

¶36

Page 4 of 5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

Appeal (CAD) No.46 of 2024

¶39

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.

¶40

(kpl)

¶41

Appeal (CAD) No.46 of 2024

¶42

10.12.2024

¶43

___________ Page 5 of 5_

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Shivsu Canada Pure Fillers Private Limited v. Shaik Dawood Traders

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivsu Canada Pure Fillers Private Limited v. Shaik Dawood Traders

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Syntel International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Day N Day Services Pvt. Ltd.

S.Srinivasan Vs Balu

Vil Makers Vs v.Maharaja

State Bank of India Vs Mr. Mathivaanan

Mr.Hemant Nanda Vs M/S. Mercedes-Benz Services India Pvt. Ltd.

V Shree Nataraj Vs Nviz Entertainment (Opc) Pvt. Ltd.