Vil Makers v. v.Maharaja
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration appeal disposed of on record of a memorandum of compromise signed by the parties. The court accepted undertakings contained in the compromise and held that the question of referring the matter to arbitration would not arise.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of in terms of Memorandum of Compromise; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
OSA (CAD) No.148 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
OSA (CAD) No.148 of 2024
VIL Makers
Rep. by its Proprietor B.Vijay S/o. Balakrishnan 3/10-A, Sri Ragavendra Nagar 3rd Street, Ramapuram Chennai 600 089.
.. Appellant Vs.
V.Maharaja
.. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal under Section 13-1A of the Commercial Courts Act read with Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent and Section 13 of Commercial Division Act, 2015, against the order dated 25.03.2024 passed in Arb.O.P.(Comm. Div.) No.263 of 2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vil Makers
- respondent
V.Maharaja
Coram
K.R.Shriram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court