Kurios Finvest LLP Vs Reliance Creative And Content Solutions LLP

A.No.903 of 2024

A.No.903 of 2024

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

This application has been filed to grant leave of this Court to institute the suit as against the defendants who are having office outside the jurisdiction of this Court at Mumbai.

¶5

The plaintiff is a financial institution. They claim to have lent money to the defendants and they claim that the defendants are defaulters under a loan contract as amended from time to time. According to them, the defendants owe them a sum of Rs.45,95,71,918/-. The contracts were entered into only at Chennai where the plaintiff is having its registered office. Money was also lent from Chennai and part payments was also received from the defendants only to the Bank Account at Chennai. All the contracts also specify that the Court at Chennai has got jurisdiction to decide any dispute arising out of the contract.

¶6

Since major part of cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction

¶7

of this Court, this Court is inclined to grant Leave to Sue as prayed for in

¶8

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

¶9

Page No.1 of 2

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

A.No.903 of 2024

¶12

in this application. Accordingly this application is allowed as prayed for.

¶13

dpq

¶14

Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order.

¶15

The learned counsel for the plaintiff is permitted to serve notice in advance to the respondents/defendants about the proposed suit and intimate them that in all probability the suit will be listed for hearing on 19.02.2024. The learned counsel for the plaintiff is also permitted to serve notice through all modes of service including e-mail.

16.02.2024

dpq

Issue today

Page No.2 of 2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Kurios Finvest LLP v. Reliance Creative And Content Solutions LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kurios Finvest LLP v. Reliance Creative And Content Solutions LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Indchem Sales Corporation Rep By Its Partner Paresh Pratap Vasa Vs Mohib Shoes Private Limited Represented By Its Directors

Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Raj Television Network Limited Vs Bravo Hd Movies

Cethar Vessels Ltd. Rep By Power Agency Subrogee P M Soundirarajan Vs Excel Maritime And Movers Pvt. Ltd.

D.Amutha Vs Thiru.Nandhakumar IAS

Nalini Sundararaman and 2 Others Vs M/s.Shree Vari Villas Private Limited