Application to restore a suit dismissed for default as against the 2nd defendant due to counsel's non-appearance caused by a traffic jam. The court found sufficient cause shown and restored the suit as against the 2nd defendant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A. No.873 of 2024 in C.S. No.671 of 2013
A. No.873 of 2024
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
This application has been filed to set aside the order of the learned Master, dated 09.01.2014 passed in C.S. No.671 of 2013, wherein the learned Master had dismissed the suit for default as against the 2nd defendant.
plaintiff did not make his appearance on the date of the hearing before the
A. No.873 of 2024
learned Master i.e., on 09.01.2024.
time to file an application seeking to set aside the exparte order passed by this Court as against the 1st defendant.
16.02.2024
vsi2
A. No.873 of 2024
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
A. No.873 of 2024 in C.S. No.671 of 2013
16.02.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause was shown by the plaintiff to restore the suit dismissed for default as against the 2nd defendant.
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
