Allowed

S.Sankarapandian, v. Selvathurai Paramananthan and 3 others

Madras HC16 Dec 2024A/6483/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application under Order VII Rule 14 CPC was allowed to condone a 415-day delay by the third defendant in filing additional documents in the main suit. The court, satisfied with reasons and no objection from respondents, listed the matter for evidence recording.

What did the court decide?

Application to condone delay of 415 days allowed; matter listed for recording evidence on 02.01.2025.

S.Sankarapandian, Vs Selvathurai Paramananthan… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

A No. 6483 of 2024 in CS.No.544 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-12-2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN A. No. 6483 of 2024 in CS.No.544 of 2017

¶3

S.SANKARAPANDIAN,

¶4

B-4, NAGAR APARTMENT, KAZURA GARDEN, NEELANKARAI, CHENNAI 600 041.

¶5

APPLICANT(S)

¶6

¶7

SELVATHURAI PARAMANANTHAN AND 3 OTHERS S/O.SELVATHURAI, NO.3, OMEGA STRINGS APARTMENT, NEW MARKET STREET, CHOOLAIMEDU, CHENNAI 600 094.

¶8

RESPONDENT(S)

¶9

For Applicant(s): M/S.P.RAJKUMAR PANDIAN S.GOKULAKANNAN M.MUTHUSABAREESAN

¶10

For Respondent(s) :Mr.M.Nishanth

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This application has been filed to condone the delay of 415 days to grant leave for

¶13

the 3^rd defendant to file the photocopy of Additional documents namely 1) E-mails

¶14

between 3^rd defendant and Hindu Newspaper publishing company 2) payment

¶15

receipt to Hindu Newspaper publishing company 3) Hindu E-paper dated 18.08.2018 4) Whatsapp conversation of 3^rd defendant with the 1^st defendant agent

¶16

viz., cell No.860892391 5) Whatsapp conversation between 1^st and 3^rd defendant

¶17

and 6) FIR against 1^st defendant, before this court and receive the same in evidence https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

on behalf of the 3^rd defendant in the above suit.

¶19

A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J.

¶20

Heard both sides.

¶21

The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in allowing this

¶22

application.

¶23

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in this affidavit filed in support of this

¶24

application and in view of no objection submitted by the learned counsel for the

¶25

respondents, this application is allowed.

¶26

Registry is directed to list the matter before the learned Additional Master for

¶27

recording evidence on 02.01.2025.

¶28

Post the main suit on 02.01.2025.

¶29

gv 16-12-2024

¶30

¶31

SELVATHURAI PARAMANANTHAN AND 3 OTHERS S/O.SELVATHURAI, NO.3, OMEGA STRINGS APARTMENT, NEW MARKET STREET, CHOOLAIMEDU, CHENNAI 600 094.

¶32

2. BERNADETTE PARAMANANTHAN

¶33

W/O.SELVATHURAI PRAMANANTHAN, REP.BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY AGENT, SELVATHURAAI PARAMANANTHAN, NO.3, OMEGA STRINGS APARTMENT, NEW MARKET STREET, CHOOLAIMEDU, CHENNAI 600 094.

¶34

KARTHIK PANDARATHIL ALIAS KAUSHIK MENON

¶35

S/O.R.GOVINDAN KUTTY, 3B, MADURAI SRE MEENAKSHI NAGAR, SELVA STREET, VALASARAVAKKAM, CHENNAI 600 092.

¶36

4. R.GOVINDAN KUTTY

¶37

S/O.SETHUMANDHAVAN NAIR, PARVATHY NILAYAM THELUNHUTHARA NELLIKADU, THATHAMANGALAM, (PART) CHENTHAMARANAGAR,

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

PALAKKAD, KERALA STATE.

¶40

A. No. 6483 of 2024 in CS.No.544 of 2017

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Sankarapandian, v. Selvathurai Paramananthan and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sankarapandian, v. Selvathurai Paramananthan and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Kanniappan Vs Jamuna Rani and 2 others

R.Sujatha Ramesh Pawar Vs a.Kuppu Rao (Died) and 2 Others

Mrs.Geetha Vs Mrs.R.Lalitha

T.Rajendran Vs Mrs. Komala

Nandhini Ravi Vs Raja Edwin

Mrs.P.Sankari and 2 Others Vs Dr.v.Ravi Shankar