R.Sujatha Ramesh Pawar v. a.Kuppu Rao (Died) and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Madras dismissed a civil suit for partition of property due to the plaintiff's non-production for hearing on the date fixed.
The High Court at Madras dismissed a civil suit for partition of property due to the plaintiff's non-production for hearing on the date fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.S.No.240 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.S.No.240 of 2024 (O.S No.534 of 2020)
R.Sujatha Ramesh Pawar .. Plaintiff
Vs.
1.A.Kuppu Rao (died) (Amended as per order in I.A No.5 of 2022 dated 21.09.2022 L.R's 2 to 4 are already parties to suit 2.K.Kasthuri(died) (Amended as per order in I.A No.12 of 2024 dated 10.06.2024 L.R's 3 and 4 are already parties to the suit) 3.K.Sooriya Prakash 4.S.Shanthi Bai .. Defendants
Prayer: Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code praying to pass a judgement and preliminary decree against the defendants a) for partition/division and separate possession of the plaintiffs 1/5th share by metes and bounds in the property described in the schedule hereunder by appointing advocate commissioner.
C.S.No.240 of 2024
b) directing the 1st defendant to pay the plaintiff Rs.6000/- per month (or) at such rate this Court may determine as mesne profits from the plaint till the date when the plaintiff allotted her 1/5th share
c) directing the defendants to pay the plaintiff the costs and incident of the suit.
For Plaintiff : No Appearance For Defendants : Mr.S.Makesh
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for hearing on 11.12.2024, there
was no representation on behalf of the plaintiff and hence the matter was directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal" on 12.12.2024. Even today (12.12.2024), there is no representation on behalf of the plaintiffs either in person or through the counsel on record. Hence, the Civil Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
12.12.2024 Index:Yes/No (1/2) Speaking/Non-speaking Order uma
C.S.No.240 of 2024
A.A.NAKKIRAN,J.
uma
C.S.No.240 of 2024 (2/2)
C.S.No.240 of 2024
12.12.2024
R.Sujatha Ramesh Pawar
K.Sooriya Prakash
S.Shanthi Bai
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court