Allowed
V.Muthukrishnan v. J.S.N.Transport and 2 others
Madras HCA/5934/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Allowed an application for additional documents and listed the matter for recording evidence.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed subject to proof and relevancy; registry directed to list matter for evidence.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.No.5934 of 2024 in C.S.No.25 of 2015
¶2
A.No.5934 of 2024 in C.S.No.25 of 2015
¶3
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
¶4
This application has been filed to receive the additional documents mentioned in the Judge's summons filed by the applicant/plaintiff in the above suit.
¶5
- Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
¶6
- There is no representation on behalf of the respondent.
¶7
- Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed
¶8
in support of this application, this application is allowed subject to proof and relevancy.
¶9
- Registry is directed to list the matter before the learned
¶10
Additional Master - II for recording evidence on 25.11.2024.
¶11
18.11.2024
¶12
Page 1 of 2
Coram
AI extract
A.A.NAKKIRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court