Application for leave to sue in a patent infringement suit; plaintiff's principal place of business is Chennai while defendants' office is outside Chennai. Court found the reasons satisfactory and granted leave as prayed for.
Leave to sue granted as prayed for; Registry directed to number the suit if otherwise in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A. No.1414 of 2024
A. No.1414 of 2024
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
This application has been filed seeking leave to sue the defendants.
products are being sold all over India including Chennai. The plaintiff is having the principal place of its business at Chennai. Since the defendants are having their office outside Chennai, this application has been filed.
support of this application for grant of leave to sue. Accordingly, A. No.1414 of 2024 is allowed as prayed for.
12.03.2024
vsi2
1/2
A. No.1414 of 2024
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
A. No.1414 of 2024
12.03.2024
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Should leave be granted to sue the defendants at the principal place of business of the plaintiff in a patent infringement suit where defendants are outside Chennai?
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
