This short order allowed an application to condone a 90-day delay in filing a written statement. The court was satisfied with the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit and took the statement on record.
Application to condone the delay of 90 days in filing the written statement is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1391 of 2024 and
C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.239 of 2023
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J.,
Divo TV Private Limited ... Applicant / Defendant
Vs.
P.L.Thenappan ... Respondent / Plaintiff
Learned counsel for the respondent / plaintiff has not raised any
serious objection for allowing A.No.1391 of 2024 which has been filed by the applicant / defendant seeking for condoning the delay of 90 days in filing the written statement.
11.03.2024
ab
Note: Post the matter for filing of affidavit of admission / denial of documents on 25.03.2024.
1/2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J.,
ab
A.No.1391 of 2024 and C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.239 of 2023
11.03.2024
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 90 days in filing the written statement should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Divo TV Private Limited
P.L.Thenappan
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
