R.Jim, v. the Bar Council of Tamilnadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Three Writ Petitions alleging irregularities in the Tirunelveli Bar Association Election 2018 were dismissed as the election had already been conducted and office bearers had taken over charge, leaving no cause for adjudication.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) Nos.9244, 9333 & 9602 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD) Nos.9244, 9333 and 9602 of 2018 and
W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8546, 8547, 8631, 8875 and 11747 of 2018
W.P.(MD) No.9244 of 2018:
R.Jim .. Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry, Rep., by its Secretary, No.19, NSC Bose Road, High Court Campus, George Town, Chennai-600 104.
- 2.The Secretary, Tirunelveli Bar Association, District Court Buildings, Tirunelveli-2.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Jim
- respondent
The Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry
- respondent
The Secretary, Tirunelveli Bar Association
- respondent
The Returning Officers, (Bar Association Election, 2018)
- respondent
S.Periya Raja
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court