Dr.a.Priya Aarthy v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenging NEET allotment orders sought quashing and direction for course selection. On appearance, counsel stated petitioners subsequently obtained PG allotment and completed the course. The court held the petitions had no substance and closed them without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)Nos.11392, 11393, 9235 and 10235 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)Nos.11392, 11393, 9235 and 10235 of 2018 and
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10385 to 10388, 8535, 9278 and 9279 of 2018
W.P.(MD)No.11392 of 2018
Dr.A.Priya Aarthy
... Petitioner
versus
- The Secretary, Medical Council of India, Dwaraka, New Delhi.
- The Director General of Health Services, Nirman Bhavan, Moulana Azad Road, New Delhi – 110 011.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr.A.Priya Aarthy
- petitioner
Dr.V.Monica
- respondent
The Secretary, Medical Council of India
- respondent
The Director General of Health Services
- respondent
The Secretary, Selection Committee, Directorate of Medical Education
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court