S.Murugan, S/O.Surulivel v. the Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for remedial action against third respondent for illegal cable TV business; closed as third respondent deceased.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.5806 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.12.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)No.5806 of 2018
S.Murugan
.. Petitioner
v.
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Marshal Road, Egmore, Chennai.
3.N.Pandiarajan .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to take appropriate action against the third respondent, who is doing illegal cable TV business in Door No.164/7, Ward No.8, Alagarsamy Street,
1/4
WP(MD)No.5806 of 2018
Gudalur, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 28.01.2018.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.J.R.Annie Abinaya, Standing Counsel for R.1, R.2
Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan for R.3 *****
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this writ petition with a grievance as against the third respondent that he is doing illegal Cable TV business in Door No. 164/7, Ward No.8, Alagarsamy Street, Gudalur, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.
2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
3.Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 & 2 submitted that both the petitioner and the third respondent were issued with license as Local Cable Operators of the Arasu Cable TV. She further submitted that
2/4
WP(MD)No.5806 of 2018
the third respondent is no more and that the petitioner has migrated to private MSO network.
4.The petitioner has filed this writ petition for taking action as against the third respondent. Since it is reported by the respondents 1 & 2 that the third respondent is no more, this writ petition is closed. No costs.
Index : Yes / No 20.12.2023 Internet : Yes gk
3/4
WP(MD)No.5806 of 2018
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
gk
WP(MD)No.5806 of 2018
20.12.2023
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Murugan
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd.
The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd.
N. Pandiarajan
B. Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court