Dismissed

S. Krishnan (Died), 1. Chandran, v. Issac (Died), Thangamani alias Thavamani (Died), Krishnan (Died), 1. Chinnakutti

Madras HC20 Dec 2023REV.APLC(MD)/92/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC to review a judgment was dismissed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court as not pressed, based on the applicant counsel's submission that she was not pressing the matter.

What did the court decide?

Review Application dismissed as not pressed.

What the court decided

S. Krishnan (Died), 1. Chandran, Vs Issac… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.92 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated: 20.12.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

REV.APL.C(MD).No.92 of 2023 in SA(MD)No.403 of 2022

¶7

Krishnan (Died) 1.Chandran 2.Vasantha Devi 3.Kanagaraj ... Review Applicants

¶8

¶9

Issac (Died) Thangamani @ Thavamani (Died) Krishnan (Died)

¶10

1.Chinnakutti Valliammal (Died) 2.Mokammal ChinnaGurusamy (Died) Chellathai(Died) 3.Gnanammal 4.Pappa Roothu (Died) 5.Paulsamy Karuppasamy (Died)

¶11

1/4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.92 of 2023

¶14

6.Janakiammal Bakkiyam (Died) 7.Kanniammal 8.Darmaraani 9.Chandrakala 10.Maheswari 11.Balasundari 12.Eswari 13.Arumugam 14.Krishnan 15.Selvi 16.Rebackaal 17.Maari 18.Kumar 19.Vasantha 20.Pushpa 21.Thaiammal 22.Buela Premasundari 23.Prabhudoss 24.Isaac Kirubakaran 25.Vijayarani 26.Paulraj Pandian 27.Elizabeth Rani ... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, to to review the judgment dated 27.10.2022 passed by this Court in SA(MD) No.403 of 2022.

¶16

For Applicant : Ms.S.Ananthi For R1,2,5,12,14, 16,17 & 18 : Ms.V.Janaki Devi

¶17

2/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.92 of 2023

¶21

This Review Application is filed to review the judgment

¶22

passed by this Court in SA(MD) No.403 of 2022, dated 27.10.2022.

¶23

2.Today(20.12.2023), when this review application is taken

¶24

up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the review applicants submits that she is not pressing this Review application and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶25

3.In view of the above, this Review application is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

¶26

20.12.2023

¶27

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn

¶28

3/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.92 of 2023

¶31

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶32

vrn

¶33

REV.APL.C(MD).No.92 of 2023 in SA(MD)No.403 of 2022

¶34

20.12.2023

¶35

4/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S. Krishnan (Died), 1. Chandran, v. Issac (Died), Thangamani alias Thavamani (Died), Krishnan (Died), 1. Chinnakutti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

S. Krishnan (Died), 1. Chandran, v. Issac (Died), Thangamani alias Thavamani (Died), Krishnan (Died), 1. Chinnakutti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karuppasamy .M Vs The Commissioner

L.Kanagavalli Vs the District Collector

Radhakririshnan.a Vs The Chief Secretary to Government

Mahadanapuram Grama Vs the Collector

V.N.Senthil Vs the Managing Director

S.Murugan, S/O.Surulivel Vs the Managing Director