Pandiyan.M v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.53 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P(MD)No.53 of 2022
M.Pandiyan
... Petitioner
Vs.
2.Balamurugan
... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to measure the properties comprised in Survey No.434/2 and extent of 0.15.0 ares and S.No.444/6 to an extent of 0.22.0 ares situated in Ambalakaranpatti Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai, after due notice to the parties, within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.Babu Rajendran For R1 : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan
1/3
W.P(MD)No.53 of 2022
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner had addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai, dated 19.04.2023, seeking permission of this Court, to withdraw the writ petition.
costs.
21.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No
pnn
To
The Tahsildar, Melur Division, Melur.
2/3
W.P(MD)No.53 of 2022
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
pnn
W.P(MD)No.53 of 2022
21.04.2023
3/3
M. Pandiyan
The Tahsildar, Melur Division, Melur
Balamurugan
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court