Disposed

Neminathan P v. The District Registrar

Madras HC21 Apr 2023WP(MD)/5141/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed the District Registrar, Karur District to dispose of an appeal pending with the second respondent regarding cancellation of a supplementary deed dated 25.11.2017 within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to first respondent to dispose of the pending appeal for cancellation of supplementary deed on or before 31.07.2023 after affording opportunities to all parties.

Neminathan P Vs The District Registrar — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.5141 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.04.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.5141 of 2023

¶7

1.P.Neminathan

¶8

2.P.N.Kuppusamy

¶9

3.P.Meignanamoorthy

¶10

4.S.Nallasamy

5.Ramasamy

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.The District Registrar, Karur District, Karur.

¶15

2.The Sub Registrar, Chinnatharauram Sub Registrar Office, Chinnatharapuram, Karur District. ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to dispose the appeal filed by the petitioners to cancel the supplementary deed dated 25.11.2017 in document No.1/2018/4BK on the file of 2nd respondent Sub Registrar, Chinnatharapuram and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a time limit as stipulated by this Court.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/4

¶19

W.P(MD)No.5141 of 2023

¶20

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Sivachandran

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.

¶24

The writ petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus seeking a direction against the first respondent, District Registrar, Karur District, Karur to dispose the appeal filed by the petitioners to cancel a supplementary deed dated 25.11.2017 in document No.1/2018/4BK on the file of the second respondent/ Sub Registrar, Chinnatharauram Sub Registrar Office, Chinnatharapuram, Karur District.

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that with respect to cancellation of the said deed, though a suit has been filed independently an application has been preferred by the first petitioner. By this writ petition the petitioners seek earlier disposal.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

W.P(MD)No.5141 of 2023

¶29

Since the matter is under consideration of the first respondent it would

¶30

be extremely inappropriate on the part of this Court to examine the issue on merits.

¶31

After hearing the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for

¶32

the respondents, a direction is given to the first respondent that after affording opportunities to all parties, endeavour to dispose of the appeal which is pending before him on or before 31.07.2023.

¶33

This Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶34

21.04.2023

¶35

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No

¶36

pnn

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

3/4

¶39

W.P(MD)No.5141 of 2023

¶40

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶41

pnn

¶42

¶43

1.The District Registrar, Karur District, Karur.

¶44

2.The Sub Registrar, Chinnatharauram Sub Registrar Office, Chinnatharapuram, Karur District.

¶45

W.P(MD)No.5141 of 2023

¶46

21.04.2023

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

4/4

Neminathan P v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neminathan P v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tamil Selvan Vs The Sub Registrar

Devaki D Vs The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Kumaresan C Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Pandiyan.M Vs the Tahsildar

V.Shanmugavelu, Vs Babu

Santhosh Vs The Regional Passport Officer