Dismissed

Amirtham G v. the District Registrar

Madras HC11 Oct 2023WP(MD)/3714/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. Since the petitioner did not appear, the Court directed the Respondent District Registrar to conclude the ongoing enquiry regarding a document registered in 2020 within three months, applying relevant circulars, while expressly reserving judgment on the merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Amirtham G Vs the District Registrar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.3714 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.3714 of 2022

¶7

G.Amirtham ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Registrar, Registration Department, Tiruchirapalli. ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to pass orders in the enquiry proceedings conducted on

¶11

02.08.2021 within a time frame stipulated by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : No appearance

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Spl. Government Pleader.

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P(MD)No.3714 of 2022

¶17

ORDER

¶18

None appeared for the writ petitioner on the earlier occasion. Even

¶19

today also, there is no representation for the petitioner, though the case is posted under the caption “for dismissal”.

¶20

2.The only relief sought for in the writ petition is for directing the respondent to conclude the petition mentioned enquiry.

¶21

3.The petitioner wants a document executed and registered in the year 2020 to be cancelled. Though Section 77-A of the Registration Act may not be applicable, certain circulars issued by the Inspector General of Registration were then in force. As per the terms of the circulars, a document can be declared as fraudulent, if certain conditions are not fulfilled. The enquiry shall be concluded on the strength of the said circulars. Final order on merits and in accordance with law shall be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. All the interest parties shall be put on notice before passing final order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P(MD)No.3714 of 2022

¶25

4.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶26

11.10.2023

¶27

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶28

To:-

¶29

The District Registrar, Registration Department, Tiruchirapalli.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P(MD)No.3714 of 2022

¶33

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶34

ias

¶35

W.P(MD)No.3714 of 2022

¶36

11.10.2023

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/4

Amirtham G v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Amirtham G v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagarathinam M Vs The District Collector

Thiagarajar Mills Pvt. Limited, Vs The Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. (Tangedco)

Dhanushkodi. S Vs The District Registrar (Admin)

Omnath.T.v Vs the District Registrar (Administration)

Ponnusamy Vs the Inspector General of Registration

M/S. Jayavilas Subbaraj Spinning Mills P Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution