Disposed

Gopalakrishnan M v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC16 Feb 2023WP(MD)/3211/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the first respondent to dispose of a revision petition within a time-bound period. The court directed the submission of a representation on merits.

What did the court decide?

The first respondent directed to dispose of the revision petition within twelve weeks by filing a representation on merits.

Gopalakrishnan M Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.3211 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 16.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.3211 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3018 of 2023

M.Gopalakrishnan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thathampatti, Vadipatti, Madurai-625 218.

¶11

2.The Sub-Registrar, Vadipatti Sub Registrar Office, Madurai District.

3.R.Radhakrishnan

4.R.Bose & Pappian

... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's revision petition dated 03.02.2023 in No.B/932/2023 in accordance with law within a time bound.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/4

¶18

W.P(MD)No.3211 of 2023

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Devasena For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader for R1 : Mr.N.Satheeskumar Additional Government Pleader for R2

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶22

The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned

¶23

representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the first respondent to

¶24

pass order one way or other. Interested parties shall be put on notice.

¶25

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

16.02.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thathampatti, Vadipatti, Madurai-625 218.

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P(MD)No.3211 of 2023

¶30

2.The Sub-Registrar, Vadipatti Sub Registrar Office, Madurai District.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/4

¶33

W.P(MD)No.3211 of 2023

¶34

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶35

rmi

¶36

W.P(MD)No.3211 of 2023

¶37

16.02.2023

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Gopalakrishnan M v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopalakrishnan M v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Komalavali Vs The District Registrar

Rajeshwari.M Vs The District Collector

Shanmugam Vs The District Collector

Ragunathamoorthy Vs The Sub Registrar

Eswari. K Vs The Sub Registrar

Nagarajan Vs The Sub-Collector