Disposed
G.Vettievl v. Union of India
Madras HCWP(MD)/2582/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitions challenging share freezing orders by SEBI were closed as no instructions were received from the petitioner, leaving nothing to survive after years of pendency.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(MD)Nos.2582 and 3553 of 2020
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED: 19.10.2023
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
¶6
W.P.(MD)Nos.2582 and 3553 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.2218 to 2220 and 3002 of 2020
¶7
G.Vettivel
¶8
...Petitioner in both petitions
¶9
Vs.
¶10
- 1.Union of India, Rep.by Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Corporate Affairs,
¶11
- Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110 001.
¶12
- 2.The National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., Rep.by its Manager, Exchange Plaza, Plot No.C/1, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
G. Vettivel
- respondent
Union of India, Rep. by Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Corporate Affairs
- respondent
The National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.
- respondent
Securities Exchange Board of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court