Disposed

Chithambaram.C v. the Commissioner

Madras HC18 Oct 2023WP(MD)/2210/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus to proceed under an earlier police proceeding to lock and seal a shop, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court observed that the petitioner had obtained an order from the District Munsif Court directing respondents to deposit arrears and vacate the premises. Consequently, the Court held no further orders could be passed in the writ peti

What the court decided

AI extract

Chithambaram.C Vs the Commissioner — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.2210 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 18.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.2210 of 2021

C.Chithambaram

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Commissioner, Pattukottai Municipality, Thanjavur District.

¶11

2.Jeyabharathi Viswanathan

¶12

3.A.Mahendran ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to take appropriate action following his own proceeding Na.Ka.No. 2929/2020/F1 dated 05.11.2020 and lock and seal the shop located in D.No.114, S.No.91/B20, Big Street, Pattukottai Town, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District.

¶14

For Petitioner :Mr.MR.Sreenivasan for Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For R1 :Mr.L.P.Maurya *****

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.2210 of 2021

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to initiate action and to re-locate the shop, which is in the occupation of the second and third respondents.

¶20

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner had initiated Rent Control Proceedings before the District Munsif Court, Pattukottai, against the second and third respondents in R.L.T.O.P.No.3 of 2020 and that by an order dated 21.08.2023, the said petition has been allowed and the second and third respondents have been directed to deposit the arrears of rent and also to vacate the subject property within a period of three months.

¶21

3.In view of the above developments, no further orders can be passed in this Writ Petition. It is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedy pursuant to the order passed by the Rent Controller Authority.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.2210 of 2021

¶25

4.This Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

¶26

Index :Yes / No 18.10.2023 Internet :Yes NCC : Yes/No cmr

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD)No.2210 of 2021

¶30

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶31

cmr

¶32

W.P.(MD)No.2210 of 2021

¶33

18.10.2023

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

4/4

Chithambaram.C v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Chithambaram.C v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Vs the Principal Secretary

Parvathi.M Vs the Special Officer

S.P.Sathasivam Vs The District Revenue Officer

Vijayashree.S Vs the District Collector

Raju.a Vs The District Collector

Anbalagan.N.N Vs the Dist Collector