Dismissed

Bharathazhwar.v v. the Special Thasildar

Madras HC7 Dec 2023WP(MD)/2476/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment dismisses a writ petition challenging a notification issued on 06.07.2015 by the Special District Revenue Officer regarding land acquisition. The Court found no illegality in the acquisition procedure, noting that proceedings were complete and compensation determined.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed with 'no costs', and consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Bharathazhwar.v Vs the Special Thasildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 07.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD).Nos.2058 and 2059 of 2021

¶8

1.V.Bharathazhwar

¶9

2.Vijayalakshmi

¶10

3.Venkataramanujam

¶11

4.Dhanalakshmi

¶12

5.V.Srinivasan ... Petitioners

¶13

Vs.

¶14

1.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Sipcot Alagu – 5, Iruppu, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

¶15

2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

¶16

3.The Secretary to the Government of Tamilnadu, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -1.

¶17

1/5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021

¶20

4.The Special District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition) SIPCOT, Virudhunagar.

¶21

5.State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited, (SIPCOT), Represented by its Managing Director, 19A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶22

... Respondents

¶23

(R-5 is impleaded vide Court Order dated 07.12.2023 in W.M.P.(MD).No.12421 of 2021 in W.P.(MD).No.2476 of 2021)

¶24

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the fourth respondent in dated 06.07.2015 made in No.D1/21962/10 U-5/B-3/15 and quash the said impugned notification of the respondents as illegal and without jurisdiction.

¶25

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Ravisankar For R-1 to R-3 : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader For R-4 and R-5 : Mr.M.Gangatharan Standing Counsel

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned notification of

¶28

the fourth respondent dated 06.07.2015 whereby the property belonging to the

¶29

petitioners was acquired under Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/5

¶32

W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021

¶33

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Standing

¶34

Counsel appearing on behalf of the impleaded fifth respondent submitted that the acquisition proceeding has been completed and the land has also been handed over to the SIPCOT and the compensation amount has also been determined and deposited. The written instructions received from the first respondent was also placed before this Court.

¶35

3. In the considered view of this Court, this Court does not find any illegality in the procedure that was adopted by the respondents for acquisition of the property belonging to the petitioners. Hence, there is no question of interfering with the notification issued by the fourth respondent through proceedings dated 06.07.2015. That apart, the acquisition proceedings itself has been completed and the award has also been determined and deposited. In view of the same, it will be left open to the petitioners to withdraw the award amount lying before the Principal District Court, Srivilliputhurr.

¶36

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021

¶38

4. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently,

¶39

connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶40

07.12.2023

¶41

NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr

¶42

¶43

1.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Sipcot Alagu – 5, Iruppu, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

¶44

2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

¶45

3.The Secretary to the Government of Tamilnadu, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -1.

¶46

4.The Special District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition) SIPCOT, Virudhunagar.

¶47

5.The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited, (SIPCOT), 19A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

4/5

¶50

W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021

¶51

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶52

Nsr

¶53

W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021

¶54

07.12.2023

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

5/5

Bharathazhwar.v v. the Special Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharathazhwar.v v. the Special Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar.G Vs the District Collector

Av Science and Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Vs Union of India

Devamani Rajan.M Vs Union of India

Jegatheese.v.S.R. Vs the District Collector

Kaliakkavilai Thinasari Santhai Vs the Govt of Tamil Nadu

Nallathambi.S Vs the State of Tamil Nadu