Thangaraj, v. the District Revenue Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed parties to file further petitions before revenue authorities after the finality of pending civil proceedings in O.S.Nos.280 and 282 of 2012, and closed the writ petition without allowing the quashing of the impugned order.
What the court decided
WP(MD)No.17086 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD)No.17086 of 2013 and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013
Thangaraj
... Petitioner
/vs/
- 1.The District Revenue Officer,
- Dindigul District.
- 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.
- 3.The Tahsildar, Oddanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the impugned order regarding restoration of revenue records should be allowed pending finality of civil proceedings.
Whether the parties are at liberty to approach revenue authorities after the conclusion of related civil suits.
Whether the connected miscellaneous petition requires any separate disposal order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thangaraj
- respondent
District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District
- respondent
Tahsildar, Oddanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court