Disposed

S.Peter Raj v. The Chief Secretary to Government

Madras HC2 Jan 2023WP(MD)/16462/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court issued a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court ordered the Chief Secretary to Tamil Nadu to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks. The writ petition was subsequently disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The First Respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks.

S.Peter Raj Vs The Chief Secretary to Government — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP(MD)No.16462 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 02.01.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD)No.16462 of 2019

S.Peter Raj

... Petitioner

/vs./

1.The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.

¶10

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai -600 006. 3.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to take appropriate action for sanction of prosecution by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2019.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.J.David Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate

¶13

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

WP(MD)No.16462 of 2019

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Writ Petition is filed, seeking for a direction to direct the respondents to take appropriate action for sanction of prosecution for considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2019.

¶17

Without going into the merits alleged in this writ petition, the first respondents is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.02.2019 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

3.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶19

02.01.2023

¶20

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶21

pnn

¶22

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

WP(MD)No.16462 of 2019

¶24

¶25

1.The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.

¶26

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai -600 006.

¶27

3.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶28

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

WP(MD)No.16462 of 2019

¶30

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶31

pnn

¶32

Order made in W.P.(MD) No.16462 of 2019

¶33

02.01.2023

¶34

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Peter Raj v. The Chief Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Peter Raj v. The Chief Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Rayappan, Vs the District Revenue Officer

T.M. Subramanian, Vs the District Collector

Mariappan Vs the Chief Engineer

S.Senthilkumar Vs the Chief Information Commissi

Ibramisa, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Y.Rethinabalan,S/O.Yesurethnam Vs the Executive Officer