Mariappan v. the Chief Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to stop installation of wind mills and poles on agricultural land. Court found installation completed and closed petition allowing remedy.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed in satisfaction that wind mills and poles were already installed; liberty to file remedy with aggrieved authority.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD) No.9402 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P.(MD) No.9402 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8701 of 2018
Mariappan ... Petitioner
/vs./
- 1.The Chief Engineer, Non-Conventional Energy Sources (NCES), TANGEDCO, Annasalai,
Chennai.
- 2.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
- 3.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mariappan
- respondent
The Chief Engineer, Non-Conventional Energy Sources (NCES), TANGEDCO
- respondent
The District Collector, Tuticorin District
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, Non-Conventional Energy Sources (NCES), TANGEDCO
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court