Disposed

Karupaiah v. The District Collector

Madras HC19 Dec 2023WP(MD)/15767/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging land revenue record discrepancies was disposed of without merits scrutiny. The High Court directed the District Revenue Officer to pass a final order on merits within twelve weeks after placing all interested parties on notice.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Revenue Officer to dispose of the appeal on merits within twelve weeks after placing interested parties on notice.

Karupaiah Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)NO.15767 OF 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 19.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.15767 of 2023 AND W.M.P.(MD)No.18817 of 2023

¶7

Karupaiah ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Collector, Madurai District Collector Office, Madurai.

¶10

The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Tahsildar Office, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to dispose of the appeal and pass final order in respect of the petitioner's application dated 11.10.2021 for rectifying the mistake as 54¼ cents instead of 49 cents is entered in computer chitta in old Survey No.157/1, 3A, 156/2 New survey No.312/12, 13, 14, 20, 22, 23, 157/1, 156/2 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court based on the representation dated 21.06.2023.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivaprakash

¶14

For Respondents: Mr.M.Sidharthan, Additional Government Pleader. * * *

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

2 W.P.(MD)NO.15767 OF 2023

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶20

2.The petitioner seeks disposal of the

¶21

petition-mentioned appeal.

¶22

3. No exception can be taken to the said request. The second respondent is directed to pass final order on the petition mentioned appeal on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

4. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The second respondent shall put all the interested parties on notice before passing final order. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶24

5. This writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

19.12.2023

¶26

NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/4

¶29

3 W.P.(MD)NO.15767 OF 2023

¶30

To:

¶31

The District Collector, Madurai District Collector Office, Madurai.

¶32

The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶33

The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Tahsildar Office, Madurai District.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

4 W.P.(MD)NO.15767 OF 2023

¶37

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

¶38

PMU

¶39

W.P.(MD)No.15767 of 2023

¶40

19.12.2023

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

Karupaiah v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karupaiah v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Correspondent Vs Ms.Rama

Chandrasekaran.K Vs The District Collector

Veerammal Vs the District Collector

Mohamed Abuthalif Vs The District Registrar

Mohanraj Vs The Executive Engineer

Balasubramaniyan.M Vs The Principal Secretary