Disposed

Priyadharshni.R v. The Thasildar

Madras HC24 Jan 2023WP(MD)/1286/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition under Article 226 seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar to consider a representation dated 15.11.2021 regarding encroachment in a public road. The Court directed the respondent to consider the representation, remove the encroachment if found, issue a notice to all parties, and follow due process within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

First respondent directed to consider representation dated 15.11.2021, remove encroachment by issuing notice to parties, affording personal hearing, and taking action within twelve weeks.

Priyadharshni.R Vs The Thasildar — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.01.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2023

R.Priyadharshni

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Tahsildar, O/o. Uthamapalayam Taluk Office, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.

¶11

2.Ganesan ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.11.2021 within a time frame as fixed by this Court and to remove the encroachment made by the second respondent in the Palace Street-Public Road, Kombai Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ponniah

¶14

For R – 1 : Mr.K.Balasubramani

¶15

Special Government Pleader

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

ORDER

¶19

W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2023

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

¶21

The prayer in this Writ Petition is seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.11.2021 within a time frame as stipulated by this Court and to remove the encroachment made by the second respondent in the Palace Street-Public Road, Kombai Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

¶22

According to the petitioner, she made a representation, dated 15.11.2021 to the first respondent seeking for removal of the encroachment made by the second respondent in the road. Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

¶23

The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent, on instructions, submitted that the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.11.2021 would be considered and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law.

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2023

¶27

In view of the abovesaid submission, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.11.2021 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law. If there is any encroachment as claimed by the petitioner, after issuing notice to all other parties including the second respondent, the first respondent shall take necessary action for removal of the encroachment, after affording sufficient opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties concerned and by following due process of law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶29

costs.

¶30

[D.K.K.,J.] [R.V.,J.] Index : Yes / No 24.01.2023 Internet : Yes ps To

¶31

The Tahsildar, O/o. Uthamapalayam Taluk Office, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2023

¶35

D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

¶36

¶37

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.1286 of 2023

¶38

DATED : 24.01.2023

¶39

4/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Priyadharshni.R v. The Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyadharshni.R v. The Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Ksm Leather Exports Vs The Authorized Officer / Assistant General Manager

Leonammal Corera Vs The Commissioner of Corporation

The Chairman-Cum-Managing Director Vs S. Jeganathan Jebaraja

Ramesh.M Vs The District Collector

Sulochana Ammal Vs the Tahsildar

Maniram.M Vs The Authorized Officer