Disposed

Leonammal Corera v. The Commissioner of Corporation

Madras HC23 Jan 2023WP(MD)/392/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition for mandamus to remove stagnant water and repair a road in Thoothukudi was disposed of. Respondent counsel submitted the issue was resolved before the matter could be heard. Court closed the petition with liberty to approach the authority again if necessary.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed with liberty to approach the authority concerned to redress any remaining grievance.

Leonammal Corera Vs The Commissioner of Corporation — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.392 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.392 of 2023

¶7

Leonammal Corera ... Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

The Commissioner of Corporation, Thoothukudi Corporation, Thoothukudi.

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to remove the stagnant and drainage water in the 4^th Street, Lions Town West, South Cotton Road, Ward No.47, Thoothukudi, immediately for the welfare of all kinds of people and maintain the road properly by spreading the gravel stones in the undisputed 10 out of 20 feet or by following any intellectual and reasonable method in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 23.12.2022 within a time frame, as fixed by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhanakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.N.Anandakumar, Standing Counsel

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

ORDER

¶16

W.P(MD)No.392 of 2023

¶17

(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

¶18

The prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to remove the stagnant drainage water in the 4^th Street, Lions Town West, South Cotton Road, Ward No. 47, Thoothukudi, immediately for the welfare of all kinds of people and maintain the road properly by spreading the gravel stones in the undisputed 10 out of 20 feet or by following any intellectual and reasonable method, in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 23.12.2022 within a time frame.

¶19

2. On 09.01.2023, we passed the following order:-

¶20

''Mr.N.Ananda Kumar, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondent and submits that the petitioner has filed an Second Appeal in S.A.(MD)No.42 of 2012, wherein status-quo has been granted and the same is still pending. Therefore, the petitioner has to seek her remedy in the Second Appeal. He further submitted that the petitioner has made an objection for laying gravel stones in front of her house. In respect of the issue with regard to stagnation of

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P(MD)No.392 of 2023

¶24

water in and around the house of the petitioner, the petitioner has to make a request to the respondent Corporation and the Corporation will consider the same and take necessary steps for removal of the same.

¶25

2.Post the matter on 23.01.2023 for filing compliance

¶26

report.''

¶27

Today, when the writ petition was taken up for hearing,

¶28

learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, submitted that the stagnant drainage water in the place in question, has been removed.

¶29

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is

¶30

closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned to redress his grievance, if any. No costs.

¶31

NCC : Yes / No [D.K.K.,J.] & [R.V.,J.] Index : Yes / No 23.01.2023 Internet : Yes bala

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P(MD)No.392 of 2023

¶35

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

¶36

bala

¶37

¶38

The Commissioner of Corporation, Thoothukudi Corporation, Thoothukudi.

¶39

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.392 of 2023 DATED : 23.01.2023

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Leonammal Corera v. The Commissioner of Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Leonammal Corera v. The Commissioner of Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan.N Vs The Authorized Officer

Suseela Devi.T Vs The Managing Director cum Chief Executive Officer

Sathishkumar.R Vs The Commissioner

M/s.Ksm Leather Exports Vs The Authorized Officer / Assistant General Manager

The Chairman-Cum-Managing Director Vs S. Jeganathan Jebaraja

M/s. Samvrooms Automotives Vs The Chief Manager