Disposed

M.H.249, Meenakshi Nagar, v. the Director of Handlooms &

Madras HC23 Feb 2023WP(MD)/11439/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court closed a petition seeking a mandamus against the second respondent for compelling the petitioner cooperative society to admit new members in violation of its bye-laws and a resolution. The respondent submitted non-interference, leading to the petition's closure.

What did the court decide?

None granted. The writ petition was closed without a further order.

M.H.249, Meenakshi Nagar, Vs the Director of Handlooms & — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.11439 of 2016

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.02.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.11439 of 2016

¶7

The President,

¶8

Weavers Co-operative Society Limited, M.H.249, Meenakshi Nagar, G.N.Ramdoss, Vandiyur, Madurai-625 020.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The Director of Handlooms & Textiles, Kuralagam, Chennai-108.

¶12

2.The Assistant Director, Department of Handlooms & Textiles, Madurai.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second respondent from compelling the petitioner society namely M.H. 249, Meenakshi Nagar, Weavers Co-operative Society Limited to admit new members against the bye-laws of M.H.249, Meenakshi Nagar, Weavers Co-opertaive Society Limited and the resolution dated 01.06.2016.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P(MD)No.11439 of 2016

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.R.Ramesh Raja For Respondents : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam

¶19

Government Advocate

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This writ petition is filed for a mandamus, |forbearing the

¶22

second respondent from compelling the petitioner society namely M.H. 249, Meenakshi Nagar, Weavers Co-operative Society Limited to admit new members against the bye-laws of M.H.249, Meenakshi Nagar, Weavers Co-opertaive Society Limited and the resolution dated 01.06.2016.

¶23

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that they have never interfered into the affairs of the admission of members in the petitioner's society and to that effect, he has also filed a counter affidavit before this Court.

¶24

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed as

¶25

no further order is required. No costs.

23.02.2023

Index :Yes/No tta

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P(MD)No.11439 of 2016

¶31

To,

¶32

1.The Director of Handlooms & Textiles, Kuralagam, Chennai-108.

¶33

2.The Assistant Director, Department of Handlooms & Textiles, Madurai.

¶34

3/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P(MD)No.11439 of 2016

¶37

B.PUGALENDHI,J

¶38

tta

¶39

W.P(MD)No.11439 of 2016

¶40

23.02.2023

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.H.249, Meenakshi Nagar, v. the Director of Handlooms &

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.H.249, Meenakshi Nagar, v. the Director of Handlooms &

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Inspector of Police Vs Thiru.M.Pandian

Puliprabakaran, S/O.T.Muthu Vs the Superintending Engineer

T.Jaishankar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

P.Anandaraj, S/O.Periyasamy Vs the District Collector

M.Ramasubbu, S/O.K.Maharajan Vs Tamil Nadu Information

Ziaul Hag Vs the Principal Executive