Petitioner challenged a demand notice and proceedings regarding a house allotment. The Court held that since the sale deed was already executed in favour of the petitioner, the writ petition was filed and closed as infructuous.
The writ petition was closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.11382 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.11382 of 2014 and M.P(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
V.Selvakumar
...Petitioner
Vs
...Respondents
1/5
W.P(MD)No.11382 of 2014
PRAYER:
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned demand notice in Lr.No.R5/1014/2000/Relief G.O.115/2013, dated 05.07.2013, on the file of the respondent No.4 and impugned proceedings in Proceedings No.C1-5042/2/13 on the file of the respondent No.3, dated 09.05.2013 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondent No.4 to issue sale deed to the petitioner for his allotted ready built house No.MIG B-2, TNHB Colony, Sankaraperi, Thoothukudi, on payment of difference in land cost without any interest within the time period stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.S.Velmurugan Standing Counsel
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed challenging the demand
notice issued by the fourth respondent in
Lr.No.R5/1014/2000/Relief G.O.115/2013, dated 05.07.2013 and the proceedings of the third respondent in C1-5042/2/13, dated 09.05.2013.
W.P(MD)No.11382 of 2014
2.Today(02.06.2023), when this writ petition is taken
up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Housing Board submits that the amount has been settled and sale deed has also been executed in favour of the petitioner and hence nothing survives in this writ petition.
3.Recording the submission made on behalf of the Housing Board, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
02.06.2023
NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn
W.P(MD)No.11382 of 2014
To
W.P(MD)No.11382 of 2014
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn
Order made in W.P(MD)No.11382 of 2014 and M.P(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
02.06.2023
V. Selvakumar
The State of Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu Housing Board
The Financial Adviser, Tamil Nadu Housing Board
The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board
B. Pugalen PHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
