Dismissed

Vijaykumar Thondaman.R v. The District Collector

Madras HC1 Jun 2023WP(MD)/3884/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P. (MD) No.3884 of 2023 and connected cases seeking maintenance for the petitioner's mother under TN Maintenance Rules. Petitioner's counsel withdraws petition citing the mother's death. Court dismisses it as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's contract to withdraw writ petition accepted; dismissal with no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Vijaykumar Thondaman.R Vs The District… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.3884 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 01.06.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.3884 of 2023 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3726, 3728 and 5564 of 2023

¶8

R.Vijayakumar Thondaman ... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate, Pudukottai District.

¶11

The Superintendent of Police, O/o. District Superintendent, Pudukottai District.

¶12

The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, Trichy District.

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukottai District.

¶14

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.3884 of 2023

¶17

The Inspector of Police, Condonement Police Station, Trichy District.

¶18

Charubala

¶19

Janaki Manokari

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 5 to protect the petitioner's mother and recover from respondent No.6 and ensure the life as per Section 20 of Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules 2009.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar for M/s.Lajapathi Roy and Associates For R1 to R5 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader For R6 : Mr.K.R.Nishanth For R7 : Mr.S.Venkatesh

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

¶25

since the petitioner's mother died, the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission of

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.3884 of 2023

¶29

this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶30

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶31

01.06.2023

¶32

ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶33

The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate, Pudukottai District.

¶34

The Superintendent of Police, O/o. District Superintendent, Pudukottai District.

¶35

The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, Trichy District.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.(MD)No.3884 of 2023

¶39

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶40

ogy

¶41

The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukottai District.

¶42

The Inspector of Police, Condonement Police Station, Trichy District.

¶43

W.P.(MD)No.3884 of 2023

¶44

01.06.2023

¶45

4/4

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Vijaykumar Thondaman.R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijaykumar Thondaman.R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Afrina Banu Vs The Registrar

V.Vimal Ravindra Raja Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Manickam Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

A.Panchammal Vs the District Collector

Annakkili Vs the Deputy Registrar

Emgs. Arun Pothyraj, Vs the Tahsildar