Disposed

Tvl. Ramana Textiles Private Limited v. The Commissioner of State of GST and Commercial Taxes

Madras HC20 Jan 2023WP(MD)/1027/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ to direct GST authorities to refund excess ITC for 2017. Court directed petitioner to submit a manual application with documents to the fourth respondent. Fourth respondent directed to decide within 8 weeks. Writ disposed.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to submit manual application with supporting documents to fourth respondent; fourth respondent directed to decide within 8 weeks.

Tvl. Ramana Textiles Private Limited Vs The Commissioner… — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD).No.1027 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 20.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P(MD)No.1027 of 2023

¶7

Tvl. Ramana Textiles Private Limited, No.56C, Virudhunagar Main Road, Mallankinar – 626 109, Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu, India.

¶8

..... Petitioner

¶9

Vs-

¶10

The Commissioner of State GST and Commercial Taxes, State CT Head Office, Ezhilagam, No.3, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶11

The Joint Commissioner (CT)/(ST), Office of the Joint Commissioner (CT) Tirunelveli.

¶12

The Assistant Commissioner (CT)/ (ST) Office of the Assistant Commissioner (CT) Aruppukkottai Assessment Circle, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District.

¶13

Page No.1/6

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P(MD).No.1027 of 2013

¶16

The Assistant Commissioner (CT)/ (ST) Office of the Assistant Commissioner (CT) Virudhunagar ST-II Circle, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the respondent to refund the eligible excess ITC amount for the month of September to December 2017, on the petitioner's application dated 28.11.2018 in accordance with law within the time frame.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.Raja. Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to refund the eligible excess ITC amount for the month of September to December 2017, based on the petitioner's application dated 28.11.2018 in accordance with law within the time frame.

¶21

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that originally he had made an application for refund the eligible ITC amount Page No.2/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P(MD).No.1027 of 2013

¶24

before the third respondent and the same was rejected directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional officer viz., 4^th respondent herein. The petitioner had approached the 4^th respondent. Since the refund was for the period of the year 2017 and the jurisdiction in respect of the fourth respondent came only from 2019, the 4^th respondent directed the petitioner to approach the third respondent. Thereafter, the petitioner had approached the third respondent by way of manual application, dated 21.10.2021. The third respondent by its communication dated 15.12.2021, had requested the second respondent herein seeking recommendation/advise as regards to consider the application of the petitioner. Thereafter, no action has been taken. Hence, the petitioner approached this Court by way of this instant Writ Petition.

¶25

Mr.D.Gandhiraj, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that they are willing to consider the request of the petitioner provided the petitioner makes manual application along with the supporting documents to the fourth respondent.

¶26

Page No.3/6

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD).No.1027 of 2013

¶29

Considering the statement made by the learned Special Government Pleader, this Court directs the petitioner to give a manual application to the fourth respondent along with supporting documents within a period of two weeks from today. The fourth respondent is directed to consider the request of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight (8) weeks thereafter.

¶30

With the above said directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶31

No costs.

¶32

20.01.2023 NCC: Yes / No (2/2) Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi

¶33

Note: Issue order copy on 23.01.2023

¶34

Page No.4/6

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P(MD).No.1027 of 2013

¶37

¶38

The Commissioner of State GST and Commercial Taxes, State CT Head Office, Ezhilagam, No.3, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶39

The Joint Commissioner (CT)/(ST), Office of the Joint Commissioner (CT) Tirunelveli.

¶40

The Assistant Commissioner (CT)/ (ST) Office of the Assistant Commissioner (CT) Aruppukkottai Assessment Circle, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District.

¶41

The Assistant Commissioner (CT)/ (ST) Office of the Assistant Commissioner (CT) Virudhunagar ST-II Circle, Virudhunagar District.

¶42

Page No.5/6

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P(MD).No.1027 of 2013

¶45

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶46

ebsi

¶47

Order made in W.P(MD)No.1027 of 2023

¶48

20.01.2023 (2/2)

¶49

Page No.6/6

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tvl. Ramana Textiles Private Limited v. The Commissioner of State of GST and Commercial Taxes

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl. Ramana Textiles Private Limited v. The Commissioner of State of GST and Commercial Taxes

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tmt. a. Kamatchiammal Vs the District Revenue Officer

L. Sathish, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Thangaraj Vs the Director General of Police

Tvl. Ramana Textiles Private Limited Vs The Commissioner of State of GST and Commercial Taxes

Sridhar.G Vs The Commissioner

Sri Velavan Roadways Vs Krishnarju.P