Disposed

L. Sathish, v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC19 Jan 2023WP(MD)/17133/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition under Article 226 challenged police inaction regarding intimidation to sell property. Court directed the Superintendent of Police to consider the representation dated 19.09.2014 and pass appropriate orders within six weeks, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

The respondent is directed to consider the petition dated 19.09.2014 and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

L. Sathish, Vs the Superintendent of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD).No.17133 of 2014

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 19.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P(MD)No.17133 of 2014

¶7

L.Sathish

¶8

..... Petitioner

¶9

Vs-

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Mr.Premchand, Vallioor Police Station, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶12

L.Ravi

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take action against the second respondent herein for the misuse of his official power and consequently directing the second respondent not to threaten the petitioner to execute any sale deeds regarding petitioner's property at Anaikulam Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District in favour of third respondent which amounts to interference in civil matters based upon the petitioner representation dated 19.09.2014.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/5

¶17

W.P(MD).No.17133 of 2014

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.RAnbarasu For Respondents : Mr.R.M.S.Sethuraman Additional Public Prosecutor (For R1 and R2) : Mr.R.Alagumani (For R-3)

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take action against the second respondent herein for the misuse of his official power and consequently, direct the second respondent not to threaten the petitioner to execute any sale deed regarding petitioner's property at Anaikulam Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District in favour of third respondent which amounts to interference in civil matters, based upon the petitioner's representation dated 19.09.2014.

¶21

The case of the petitioner is that the third respondent herein with the aid of the second respondent has been intimidating him to sell his property. Hence, he had sent a representation to the first respondent herein

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P(MD).No.17133 of 2014

¶25

on 19.09.2014 and the same has been received by the office of the first respondent. Even thereafter, the second respondent has been intimidating the petitioner on behalf of the third respondent. Till date, no action has been initiated. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of writ petition.

¶26

3. Considering the limited relief sought for by the writ petitioner without adverting to the averments made in the affidavit in support of the Writ Petition, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.09.2014, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

4. With the above said direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶28

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

19.01.2023

¶30

NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi

¶31

3/5

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P(MD).No.17133 of 2014

¶34

¶35

The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶36

The Inspector of Police, Mr.Premchand, Vallioor Police Station, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶37

4/5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P(MD).No.17133 of 2014

¶40

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶41

ebsi

¶42

Order made in W.P(MD)No.17133 of 2014

¶43

19.01.2023

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

5/5

L. Sathish, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L. Sathish, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Selvam, Vs the Passport Officer

A.Nagoor Vs the District Collector

Vijayan, Vs the Inspector General of

Tmt. a. Kamatchiammal Vs the District Revenue Officer

Thangaraj Vs the Director General of Police

T. Natarajan, Vs the District Collector