Disposed

C.Murugan v. The District Collector

Madras HC11 Jan 2023WP/781/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition where the petitioner sought a direction to the 4th respondent to transfer a patta in his name. The High Court directed the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider the application dated 20.04.2022 on merits within six weeks. The petition was disposed of with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents 3 and 4 to consider the petitioner's patta transfer application dated 20.04.2022 on merits within six weeks.

C.Murugan Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.781 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶6

Writ Petition No.781 of 2023

¶7

C.Murugan …. Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.The District Collector District Collector Office Tiruppur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

¶10

3.The Thasildar Avinashi Tahsildar Office Avinashi, Tiruppur District-641 652.

¶11

4.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Avinashi Tahsildar Office Avinashi, Tiruppur District-641 652. …. Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4^th respondent to transfer the patta in favour of the petitioner name and the petitioner gave application No.2022/0103/32/393351 dated 20.04.2022.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Murugesan For Respondents : Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi Government Advocate

¶14

1 / 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.781 of 2023

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Mandamus directing the directing the 4^th respondent to transfer the patta in favour of the petitioner name and the petitioner gave application No.2022/0103/32/393351 dated 20.04.2022.

¶19

The petitioner made a patta transfer application on 20.04.2022 through online to the 3^rd respondent Tahsildar and in order to consider the same, the petitioner has moved the present writ petition.

¶20

Heard Mr.M.Murugesan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.N.Senthilselvi learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

¶21

Learned Government Advocate would submit that the said application would be considered on merits and in accordance with law and orders to that effect would be passed within a time limit that may be prescribed by this Court.

¶22

Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for herein and having regard to the stand of the learned Government Advocate, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following order.

¶23

2 / 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.781 of 2023

¶26

“That there shall be a direction to the respondents 3 and 4 to consider the application of the petitioner dated 20.04.2022 and pass necessary orders thereon with regard to the plea raised therein after hearing the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

¶27

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶28

11.01.2023

¶29

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST

¶30

¶31

1.The District Collector District Collector Office, Tiruppur District.

¶32

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.

¶33

3.The Thasildar Avinashi Tahsildar Office Avinashi, Tiruppur District-641 652.

¶34

4.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Avinashi Tahsildar Office Avinashi, Tiruppur District-641 652.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3 / 4

¶37

W.P.No.781 of 2023

¶38

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

¶39

KST

¶40

W.P.No. 781 of 2023

¶41

11.01.2023

¶42

4 / 4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Murugan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Murugan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Mehar Khatoon Vs The District Collector

Savariyammal Vs The Tahsildar

Fahat Mohammed Khan Vs The District Collector

Venkatesh Kumar Vs The Commissioner of Land Administration

Radha Lakshmi Vs The District Collector