Disposed

Fahat Mohammed Khan v. The District Collector

Madras HC11 Jan 2023WP/772/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge disposed of the writ petition by directing the second respondent (Revenue Divisional Officer) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2022 regarding the permanent land register and pass necessary orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation passed on 13.09.2022 and pass necessary orders on merits within six weeks.

Fahat Mohammed Khan Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.772 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶6

Writ Petition No.772 of 2023

Fahat Mohammed Khan

…. Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The District Collector Chennai.

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai Central.

¶12

3.The Thasildar Egmore-Nungambakkam Taluk Chennai.

¶13

…. Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to issue the petitioner true and online certificate copy of extract from the permanent land register after deleting errors if any for S.Nos.36/3 to 36/43, Nungambakkam Village, Egmore, Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai District as per representation given dated 13.09.2022.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.V.K.Vijayaragavan For Respondents : Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi Government Advocate

¶16

1 / 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.772 of 2023

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to issue the petitioner true and online certificate copy of extract from the permanent land register after deleting errors if any for S.Nos.36/3 to 36/43, Nungambakkam Village, Egmore, Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai District as per representation given dated 13.09.2022.

¶21

The petitioner seeks issuance of certified copy of extract from the permanent land register for his land situated in Survey Nos.36/3 to 36/43, Nungambakkam Village, Egmore, Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai District as claimed in his representation dated 13.09.2022.

¶22

Heard Mr.V.K.Vijayaragavan learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶23

Mrs.N.Senthilselvi, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

¶24

Learned Government Advocate would submit that, the said request of the petitioner through his representation dated 13.09.2022 would be considered and necessary orders would be passed thereon on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶25

2 / 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.772 of 2023

¶28

Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for herein and having regard to the stand of the learned Government Advocate, this Court is

¶29

inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following order.

¶30

“That there shall be a direction to the 2^nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.09.2022 and pass necessary orders thereon with regard to the plea raised therein after hearing the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

¶31

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶32

11.01.2023

¶33

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST

¶34

1.The District Collector Chennai.

¶35

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai Central.

¶36

3.The Thasildar Egmore-Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai.

¶37

3 / 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.No.772 of 2023

¶40

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

¶41

KST

¶42

W.P.No. 772 of 2023

¶43

11.01.2023

¶44

4 / 4

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Fahat Mohammed Khan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fahat Mohammed Khan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Mehar Khatoon Vs The District Collector

Savariyammal Vs The Tahsildar

C.Murugan Vs The District Collector

Venkatesh Kumar Vs The Commissioner of Land Administration

Radha Lakshmi Vs The District Collector