The High Court recorded that the 3rd respondent vacated premises and the petitioner demolished unauthorised construction, stating that the order of this Court has been complied with. No further order was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.4900 of 2022 and
W.M.P.No.5047 of 2022
J.NISHA BANU, J. and
N.MALA,J.
Today, the matter is listed under
the caption 'for reporting compliance'.
appearing for the Greater Chennai Corporation would state that the 3rd respondent had vacated the premises and the petitioner had demolished the
unauthorised construction put up in the premises and therefore, the order
of this Court has been complied with.
recorded. No further order is
necessary in this writ petition.
(J.N.B,J.) (N.M.,J.) 22.11.2023
vsi
Petitioner
Greater Chennai Corporation
J. Nisha Banu
J. N. Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
