Disposed

V.Angamuthu v. The District Collector

Madras HC10 Feb 2023WP/4009/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the High Court of Judicature at Madras directed the 4th respondent (Thasildar) to dispose of the petitioner's application to cancel a settlement deed under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 4th respondent to dispose of the representation dated 28.07.2022 within eight weeks of receiving the copy of the order.

V.Angamuthu Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP.No.4009 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 10.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

W.P.No.4009 of 2023

V.Angamuthu

...Petitioner

1.The District Collector O/o The District Collector Salem District.

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer O/oThe Revenue Divisional Officer Salem District.

¶12

3.The District Revenue Officer, O/o.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Building, Salem.

¶13

4.The Thasildar, O/o.The Thasildar, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

¶14

5.The District Registrar, Collectorate Building, Salem -1.

¶15

6.A.Kumar

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

¶19

WP.No.4009 of 2023

¶20

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4^th respondent to dispose of the Petitioner's representation dated 28.07.2022 in compliance to the orders of the Sub Collector vide Na.Ka.5188/2022-vu dated 22.08.2022 within a stipulated time frame.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ganeshkumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay,[for R1 to R5] Additional Government Pleader

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

The petitioner who is a super senior citizen seeks a mandamus simplicitor

¶24

directing the 4^th respondent i.e. the Tahsildar, Omalur Taluk, Salem District to dispose his representation dated 28.07.2022 in compliance with the orders of the Sub Collector in proceedings in Na.Ka.5188/2022-vu dated 22.08.2022 within a time frame to be fixed by the Court.

¶25

2.There is no dispute that the authorities have indeed received the representation and the same is under consideration. On the receipt of the application, the petitioner seeks cancellation of settlement deed dated 24.02.2016 in terms of the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act of 2007. The Revenue Divisional Officer has, in fact, sought a report from the Tahsildar in that regard.

¶26

3.Since the competent authority under the provisions of the act is R1, let the needful be done, such that the petitioner and other necessary parties are https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis heard and the application of the petitioner dated 28.07.2022 be disposed within

¶27

¶28

WP.No.4009 of 2023

¶29

a period of eight (8) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order positively.

¶30

4.This writ petition is disposed as above. No costs.

¶31

10.02.2023

¶32

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes vs

¶33

¶34

1.The District Collector O/o The District Collector Salem District.

¶35

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer O/oThe Revenue Divisional Officer Salem District.

¶36

3.The District Revenue Officer, O/o.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Building, Salem.

¶37

4.The Thasildar, O/o.The Thasildar, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

¶38

5.The District Registrar, Collectorate Building, Salem -1.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

¶41

WP.No.4009 of 2023

¶42

Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

¶43

¶44

W.P.No.4009 of 2023

¶45

10.02.2023

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

V.Angamuthu v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Angamuthu v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Seaport Logistics Private Vs Union of India

Harvinder Kaur, Vs Indian Overseas Bank

D.Indirani Vs The Chairman

B.Sekar Vs The Assistant Engineer(O and M)

A.Uma Vs The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

M/s. Balamurugan Agency Vs The Deputy controller of Explosives