The High Court closed two writ petitions concerning a land title dispute and restoration of patta after the parties settled the issues, with no costs awarded.
The writ petitions stand closed as the issues between the parties have been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012
[W.P.No.3686 of 2012]
P.Parthiban Petitioner
Vs.
1/6
W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012
Prayer
Prayer :- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.26991/10/N3 dated 23.10.2011 confirming the order of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.7790/2007/A dated 16.06.2010, who in turn confirmed the order of the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.9884/2008/B5 dated 12.07.2008 and quash the same and direct the 3rd respondent to restore the Patta in respect of the land in Re-survey No.150-1B of Venkampakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk measuring 1 acre 74 cents (0.70.5 Hectares) to the name of the petitioner as it existed before passing order by the 3rd respondent in R.O.C.No.5581/2005/B5 dated 28.04.2006 or in to the name of Mrs.Andalammal, W/o.Manickam Naicker, as it existed before the U.D.R., pending resolution of the title dispute before the Civil Court.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : (for R1 to R3) : Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl.Govt.Pleader (for R4 to R9) : Mr.K.Senthil for M/s. Kumar and Baskar
[W.P.No.7191 of 2012]
2/6
W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012
... Petitioners
Vs.
... Respondents
Prayer :- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records from the office of the second respondent herein and to quash the impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 23.10.2011 in Na.Ka.No.26991/10/N3.
3/6
| W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012 | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioners | : Mr.K.Senthil for M/s.Kumar and Baskar |
| For Respondents | : |
| (for R1 to R4) | : Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl.Govt.Pleader |
| (for R5 to R6) | : No Appearance |
COMMON ORDER
Mr.K.Senthinl, learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 9 in W.P.No.3686 of 2012 and also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioners in W.P.No.7191 of 2012 made a submission that the issues between the parties in both the writ petitions had already been settled. Thus, no further adjudication is required.
be no order as to costs.
(sha) Index : Yes Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes
24.07.2023
4/6
W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012
To
5/6
W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM. J.,
(sha)
W.P.Nos.3686 & 7191 of 2012
24.07.2023
6/6
P.Parthiban
The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram
The Tahsildar, Tambaram
R.Natarajan
E.Shanmugavel
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
