The single judge disposed of the writ petition as a batch of similar petitions had been fully decided in W.P.No.262 of 2018 on 09.06.2023, rendering this application subservent to the batch judgment and subsequent procedural circulars.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
M.Venkatesh
... Petitioner
Vs.
2.Nagaraj
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent to dispose of the petitioner revision/appeal dated 30.04.2012 on the file of the 1 st respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jayaprakash For R1 : Mr.E.Sundaram Government Advocate
Page 1 of 7
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
O R D E R
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the 1 st
respondent to dispose of the petitioner revision/appeal dated 30.04.2012 on the file of the 1 st respondent.
“33. In view of the anomalous situation created on account of the inconsistency in dealing with the grievances of the aggrieved persons, this Court is inclined to pass the following orders:
Page 2 of 7
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
in a prescribed format by complying with the procedures under the Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 and the Rules in force.
Page 3 of 7
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
all are intending to prolong and protract the matter. Adjournments are to be granted on genuine grounds only by recording the reasons. Casual adjournments of hearing are to be avoided, which would cause prejudice to any one of the party.
Page 4 of 7
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
between the parties.
that of the cases (cited supra ), the case of the petitioner is also to be considered on the same line.
Page 5 of 7
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
21.07.2023
Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes
To The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
Page 6 of 7
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Jeni
W.P.No.1820 of 2023
21.07.2023
Page 7 of 7
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to dispose of a revision appeal filed in 2012 should be allowed in view of the judgment in W.P.No.262 of 2018.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
D.Tulasi Vs. The District Revenue Officer, DharmapuriReferred¶21
W.P.No.262 of 2018 [D.Tulasi Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri]
M.Venkatesh
District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri
Nagaraj
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
