Writ petition seeking relaxation of age limit and quashing of recruitment notification was dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.35674 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
W.P.No.35674 of 2015 and
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015
K.Sagaya Arulraj ...Petitioner Vs
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, call for the entire records connected with the recruitment notification/advertisement dated 24.09.2015 called for by the second respondent and quash the same as far as it fixes the upper age limit of 32 years for the post if Sugar Can Assistant for backward caste candidates is concerned, consequently direct the respondents to provide relaxation of upper age limit to the petitioner as per 12(d) of the Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules.
1/4
W.P.No.35674 of 2015
| For petitioner | : Ms.Haripriya |
|---|---|
| for Mr.K.Thilageswaran | |
| For R1 | : Mr.R.U.Dinesh Raj Kumar |
| Additional Government Pleader | |
| For R2 | : Mr.D.Gopal |
ORDER
Ms.Haripriya, learned counsel representing the petitioner is present
and filed a copy of a letter seeking permission of this Court to withdrawn this writ petition and she has endorsed the same on the docket of the case
bundle.
Connected M.Ps are closed. No costs.
28.11.2023
vca Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No
2/4
W.P.No.35674 of 2015
To
3/4
W.P.No.35674 of 2015
Dr.D.NAGARJUN.J,
W.P.No.35674 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015
28.11.2023
4/4
K.Sagaya Arulraj
The Commissioner of Sugar
Vellore Co-Operative Sugar Mill Ltd.
Dr. Justice D.Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
