V.Thilagaraj v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as there was no instruction from the petitioner to proceed or amend the prayer.
What the court decided
W.P.No.5204 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
W.P.No.5204 of 2015
V.Thilagaraj ...Petitioner Vs
- The Chairman Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 1.
- The Traffic Manager, Cargo Handling Division, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai - 1. ...Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay compensation in lieu of compassionate appointment given to similarly placed person based on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.04.2014 within a fixed time frame.
For petitioner : Ms.V.Jayavigneshwari for Ms.A.M.Amutha Ganesh For respondents : Mr.Kumaraguru Senior Panel Counsel
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Thilagaraj
- respondent
The Chairman Chennai Port Trust
- respondent
The Traffic Manager, Cargo Handling Division
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court